Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Denise Otto v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, et al
as 16-3385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENISE OTTO
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK NA, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC, US BANK NA, as Trustee for BNC Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-2 and others
Gennaro Rauso v. Barbara Fein, et al
as 15-3261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENNARO RAUSO
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA A. FEIN, MARTHA E. VONROSENTIEL, US BANK NA, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE HOLDERS OF THE CFSB MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-HE4 and others
MACAULEY v. ESTATE OF FRANK C. NICHOLAS et al
as 2:2010cv07057
Plaintiff:
MEGAN MACAULEY
Defendant:
ESTATE OF FRANK C. NICHOLAS, ELIZABETH NICHOLAS, CASEY NICHOLAS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
SIMONS v. BNC MORTGAGE, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv05746
Plaintiff:
JAMES SIMONS
Defendant:
BNC MORTGAGE, INC., OPAL FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC, ROBERT CONDERATO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
COOKE v. BNC MORTGAGE
as 2:2007cv00257
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL COOKE
Defendant:
BNC MORTGAGE and BNC MORTGAGE
ThirdParty Defendant:
LEXINGTON & CONCORD SEARCH AND ABSTRACT, LLC, LEXINGTON & CONCORD SEARCH AND ABSTRACT, LLC and LEXINGTON & CONCORD SEARCH AND ABSTRACT, LLC
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
BNC MORTGAGE and BNC MORTGAGE
Counter Claimant:
LEXINGTON & CONCORD SEARCH AND ABSTRACT, LLC, LEXINGTON & CONCORD SEARCH AND ABSTRACT, LLC and LEXINGTON & CONCORD SEARCH AND ABSTRACT, LLC
Counter Defendant:
BNC MORTGAGE and BNC MORTGAGE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
