Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
THOMAS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv05295
In Re: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff: BOBBY THOMAS
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMAS v. J & D TRANSPORTATION et al
as 3:2017cv02434
Plaintiff: BOBBY THOMAS
Defendant: J & D TRANSPORTATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
THOMAS et al v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv05157
Plaintiff: BARBARA THOMAS and BOBBY THOMAS
Defendant: DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: BENICAR (OLMESARTAN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
as 1:2015md02606
Plaintiff: ANITA M. GRAVES, THOMAS GARY PETTY, CINDY MILLER and others
Defendant: FOREST LABORATORIES, LLC, DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD., FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Interested Party: SHIRLEY L. SHADDIX
In Re: BENICAR (OLMESARTAN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMAS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2009cv00308
Plaintiff: BOBBIE THOMAS
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RIGDON v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as 2:2009cv74208
Plaintiff: BOBBY THOMAS RIGDON
Defendant: NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., H.K. PORTER CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
THOMAS v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv78615
Plaintiff: BOBBY THOMAS, SR.
Defendant: OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?