Cases 1 - 10 of 21
WHITFIELD v. MSG NETWORKS INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02868
Defendant:
HANK J RATNER, JOEL M LITVIN, STEPHEN MILLS and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Plumley v. MSG Networks Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00909
Defendant:
Joel M. Litvin, Kristin A. Dolan, Aidan J. Dolan and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
Anderson v. MSG Networks Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00904
Defendant:
Joel M. Litvin, Kristin A. Dolan, Aidan J. Dolan and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Anderson
Trabilcy v. Gold et al
as 1:2020cv01702
Plaintiff:
William Trabilcy
Defendant:
William D. Rueckert, Daniel P. Gold, Thomas C. Reynolds and others
Nominal Defendant:
MEI Pharma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wright v. Gold et al
as 1:2020cv01639
Defendant:
William D. Rueckert, Daniel P. Gold, Thomas C. Reynolds and others
Nominal Defendant:
MEI Pharma, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gerald Wright
D'Arcy v. Gold et al
as 1:2020cv01414
Plaintiff:
Peter D'Arcy
Defendant:
William D. Rueckert, Daniel P. Gold, Thomas C. Reynolds and others
Nominal Defendant:
MEI Pharma, Inc.
Golub v. Lance et al
as 1:2020cv01251
Defendant:
Eric J. Zahler, Robert L. Phillips, Brian G. Kenning and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Golub
Nominal Defendant:
Maxar Technologies Inc.
RAMADA WORLDWIDE, INC. v. KEYS OF TOPEKA HOSPITALITY LLC et al
as 2:2019cv14575
Defendant:
BRIAN G. SMITH, KEYS OF TOPEKA HOSPITALITY LLC and BRUCE L. ARMSTRONG
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dombroski v. Cavalry SPV I, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00545
Defendant:
Demetrios H. Tsarouhis, Cavalry SPV I, LLC and Tsarouhis Law Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
Brian G. Dombroski
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Scarantino v. Investment Technology Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00024
Defendant:
Investment Technology Group, Inc., R. Jarrett Lilien, Kevin J. Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Scarantino
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
