Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ALVAREZ v. CITY OF PHILA ET AL
as 2:2024cv03127
Plaintiff:
KING ANTHONY ALVAREZ
Defendant:
HUD, TURN, COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES doing business as CLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
ATS TREE SERVICES, LLC v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al
as 2:2024cv01743
Plaintiff:
ATS TREE SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Lina M Khan, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and others
Petitioner:
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Amicus Curiae:
National Retail Federation, National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center, Inc., INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
ELLIS et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv02450
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M. ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH DEPT., THE OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KEEL v. PHILADELPHIA'S HOUSEING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2022cv04018
Plaintiff:
JESSE LEE KEEL, III
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA'S HOUSEING AUTHORITY, COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICE and WITHS SEPTA'S CORRUPTS ARRESTING POLICE OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEEL v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2019cv01931
Plaintiff:
JESSE LEE KEEL, III
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES and DAVID WENGERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MASON v. CAMPBELL et al
as 2:2016cv01675
Plaintiff:
FLORENCE MASON
Defendant:
GIOVANNI CAMPBELL , COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA , CHRISTOPHER BOLTINGHOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
as 2:2011cv02448
Plaintiff:
COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
