Cases 1 - 8 of 8
DALANSKY v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES NON-UNION INSURANCE PROGRAM FOR ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES et al
as 2:2020cv00938
Defendant:
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES NON-UNION INSURANCE PROGRAM FOR ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES and THE UNITED STATES STEEL & CARNEGIE PENSION FUND
Plaintiff:
MARK DALANSKY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
UNITED STATES STEEL AND CARNEGIE PENSION FUND v. READAL et al
as 2:2018cv00140
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES STEEL AND CARNEGIE PENSION FUND
Defendant:
JOHN P. READAL, FRANCES S. READAL and ROSEMARY A. BOOTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
DIBARTOLA v. THE UNITED STATES STEEL AND CARNEGIE PENSION FUND
as 2:2012cv01812
Plaintiff:
TAMARA L. DIBARTOLA
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES STEEL AND CARNEGIE PENSION FUND
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION PLAN FOR EMPLOYEE PENSION BENEFITS et al v. POTURICH et al
as 3:2011cv00192
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION PLAN FOR EMPLOYEE PENSION BENEFITS , TRANSTAR, INC. SAVINGS PLAN FOR REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES , UNITED STATES STEEL AND CARNEGIE PENSION FUND and others
Defendant:
DONNA POTURICH and CECLIA POTURICH SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
William Brown v. US Steel Corp, et al
as 10-4475
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM E. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
US STEEL CORP and US STEEL CARNEGIE PENSION FUND
BROWN v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv00780
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. BROWN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION and UNITED STATES STEEL AND CARNEGIE PENSION FUND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
