Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Bennett et al v. Bannon et al
as 1:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Ret. Sgt. Craig T. Bennett, Francine M. Bennett, Aliyah M. Bennett and others
Defendant:
Eric J. Bannon, Kirk William Ruquet, Matthew R. Sarkissian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Devon Earl v. Brandon Harris, et al
as 23-1063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVON AUSTIN EARL, sui juris
Defendant / Appellee:
BRANDON HARRIS, Badge #2918, in his individual and official capacity as Police Officer of New Castle County Police Department, ALEXANDER PETERSON, in his individual and official capacity as Magistrate of Justice of the Peace Court No. 11, C. TEMPLE, Clerk (New Castle Clerk of the Peace) in her individual and official capacity as Clerk of New Castle County Justice of the Peace Courty No. 11 and others
Hayes v. James et al
as 1:2017cv00880
Plaintiff:
Earl Hayes
Defendant:
James, John Doe # 1, John Doe # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jones v. Harrington Delaware Police Department, et al
as 1:2017cv00395
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Harrington Delaware Police Department and Justice of the Peace Court Number 6, in Kent County, Delaware
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. HARRINGTON DELAWARE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2017cv00966
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
HARRINGTON DELAWARE POLICE DEPARTMENT and JUSTICE OF THE PEACE COURT NUMBER 6, IN KENT COUNTY, DELAWARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grubbs v. Newark Delaware Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv00195
Plaintiff:
Jason W. Grubbs
Defendant:
Newark Delaware Police Department , James Marconi , Maier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colahar et al v. US Bank National Association et al
as 1:2014cv00007
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Colahar and Jane Colahar
Defendant:
US Bank National Association, Mortgage Contracting Services, Adam P. Brams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
