Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DIANE EDSON v. PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv03581
Plaintiff:
DIANE EDSON
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY, AETNA INC., RAWLINGS & ASSOCIATES, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00897
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
THOMAS et al v. GONZALES et al
as 2:2013cv05368
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIAM THOMAS, JR. and BETTY THOMAS
Defendant:
EDSON GONZALES, HADDON HOUSE FOOD PRODUCTS, INC. , FCT LOGISTICS LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
HADDON HOUSE FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
Cross_defendant:
EDSON GONZALES, FCT LOGISTICS LLC, CAPOANO TRUCKING INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MTR GAMING GROUP, INC. v. ARNEAULT
as 1:2011cv00208
Plaintiff:
MTR GAMING GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
EDSON R. ARNEAULT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARNEAULT et al v. O'TOOLE et al
as 1:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
EDSON R. ARNEAULT and GREGORY J. RUBINO
Defendant:
KEVIN F. O'TOOLE , R. DOUGLAS SHERMAN , E. BARRY CREANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv78655
Plaintiff:
EDSON V. MITCHELL, JR.
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTELET v. AVAX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv02925
Plaintiff:
FRANCOIS MARTELET
Defendant:
AVAX TECHNOLOGIES, INC., GENOPOIETIC, JOHN K.A. PRENDERGAST and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
EDSON v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv79217
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDSON
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., GULF BELTING & GASKET CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
