Cases 1 - 10 of 14
MEDFORD et al v. EON LABS, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv00412
Plaintiff:
JANICE SLUSSER, KEVIN HOPPER, DIXIE MORGAN and others
Defendant:
EON LABS, INC. and SANDOZ, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEDFORD et al v. EON LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00412
Plaintiff:
JANICE SLUSSER, KEVIN HOPPER, DIXIE MORGAN and others
Defendant:
EON LABS, INC. and SANDOZ, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al.
as 1:2019cv02126
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hepler, Carletta Williams, Linda Bates and others
Defendant:
Does 1-50, Inclusive and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edward Miller v. Superintendent Pine Grove SCI, et al
as 15-3026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD ALBERT MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT PINE GROVE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY
Edward Miller, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 14-3005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD CHARLES MILLER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MARY J. ANDERS, ROBERT M. FALIN and others
MILLER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv06291
Plaintiff:
EDWARD CHARLES MILLER, JR.
Defendant:
MARY J. ANDERS and ROBERT MARTIN FALIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Kohn v. McGuire Woods, et al
as 12-3028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN KOHN, Trustee
Defendant - Appellee:
MCGUIRE WOODS, HAYMOUNT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, HAYMOUNT MEZZ and others
MILLER v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv57301
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv49570
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M MILLER
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. GRACE LINES/PRUDENTIAL LINES
as 2:2011cv48269
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. MILLER
Defendant:
GRACE LINES/PRUDENTIAL LINES
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
