Cases 1 - 10 of 26
JAG Group LLC v. Espinosa et al
as 3:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
JAG Group LLC
Defendant:
Juan G. Espinosa and Carol Espinosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Rodriguez et al v. Didomenico et al
as 1:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Jackeline Espinosa Rodriguez and Leonardo Del Rio Del Toro
Defendant:
Stephen Didomenico and N L Minich & Sons, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
SANTIAGO-ESPINOSA v. WELLPATH MEDICAL et al
as 2:2022cv02677
Plaintiff:
PEDRO SANTIAGO-ESPINOSA
Defendant:
WELLPATH MEDICAL, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, P.A. JOE WALSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ESPINOSA v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv05190
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ESPINOSA
Defendant:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
ESPINOSA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv02943
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO ESPINOSA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Altmanshofer v. Display Source Alliance, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00876
Plaintiff:
Kirk Altmanshofer
Defendant:
Henry Leaverton, Javier Espinosa, Display Source Alliance, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEVIEN et al v. HIBU PLC et al
as 2:2019cv03239
Defendant:
TOBY RUFUS COPPEL, ROBERT CHARLES MICHAEL WIGLEY, ESTATE OF JOHN MICHAEL POCOCK and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEVIEN and JAMES WESTHEAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESPINOSA v. BERRYHILL
as 5:2017cv05791
Plaintiff:
HERNAN ESPINOSA
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ESPINOSA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03607
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO ESPINOSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
