Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Candice Gair, et al v. SV Wind-Down Corporation, et al
as 24-1395
Plaintiff:
CANDICE GAIR, on behalf of herself and all others similarlysituated and RACHAEL BERRY
Defendant:
SV WIND-DOWN CORP, FKA Shop Vac Corp and GREAT STAR TOOLS, USA, Inc
Gair v. Shop-Vac Corporation
as 4:2021cv00976
Defendant:
Shop-Vac Corporation
Plaintiff:
Candice Gair
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
GAIR-LEVIN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv08728
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN GAIR-LEVIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dawn Ball v. Lamas, et al
as 12-2747
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAWN MARIE BALL
Defendant - Appellee:
LAMAS, WRIGHT, NOONAN, C/O and others
Ball v. Oden et al
as 1:2009cv00847
Plaintiff:
Dawn Ball
Defendant:
Oden, Reed, Pinard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ball v. Lamas et al
as 1:2009cv00846
Plaintiff:
Dawn Ball
Defendant:
Lamas, Wright, Lt. Noonan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawn Ball v. SCI Muncy, et al
as 09-1367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAWN MARIE BALL
Defendant - Appellee:
MUNCY SCI INST, RECORDS DEPARTMENT USP LEWISBERG, BITLER and others
Rhines v. State of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2008cv00818
Plaintiff:
Gary Rhines
Defendant:
State of Pennsylvania, Dustin J. Kreitz, Thomas H. Ungard and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ball v. SCI Muncy et al
as 1:2008cv00701
Plaintiff:
Dawn Marie Ball
Defendant:
SCI Muncy, Records dept., Bitler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dotson v. Muncy State Prison Security et al
as 4:2007cv01366
Plaintiff:
Monique Dotson
Defendant:
Muncy State Prison Security, C.O. Gair, C.O. Fulmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
