Cases 1 - 10 of 564
ACKER et al v. UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS
as 2:2024cv02468
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ACKER, MICHAEL AMENDOLA, AIDEN ANKLI and others
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Graham v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Lance Graham
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
GRAHAM v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2024cv01862
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY GRAHAM
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, ENOR INTERNATIONAL, INC. doing business as Techno Torch, BIC USA Inc. and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
LISTER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01784
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LISTER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICER REGINALD GRAHAM and JOHN DOES 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham
as 2:2024cv01114
Plaintiff:
Jean Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GRAHAM v. ARMANDO K CARPETS, LLC
as 5:2024cv01114
Plaintiff:
JEAN GRAHAM
Defendant:
ARMANDO K CARPETS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GRAHAM v. P.F. CHANG'S et al
as 2:2024cv00991
Plaintiff:
VINCENT GRAHAM
Defendant:
P.F. CHANG'S, P.F. CHANG'S CHINA BISTRO, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hollinger et al v. Menges et al
as 1:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Terry-Lee: Hollinger and Michelle-Lynn: Hollinger
Defendant:
Judge Matthew D. Menges, Allison Blew, Sheriff Richard P. Keuleber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
