Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Groover-Floyd v. USA
as 1:2024cv00459
Petitioner:
Kendrick Groover-Floyd
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GROOVER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv20411
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
PENNY H. GROOVER
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAGNETIC PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, INC. v. DEMAG SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv05840
Plaintiff:
MAGNETIC PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
DEMAG SOLUTIONS, LLC, ESTATE OF RICHARD THORNE, MARY ELLEN FOLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
GROOVER v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv09428
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JOSEPH GROOVER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, STEPHEN PRATT, BRYAN CONWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Groover v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2013cv01707
Plaintiff:
Rick L. Groover
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis US LLC , Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GROOVER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv45139
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. GROOVER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GROOVER v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv92786
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. GROOVER
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., A C & S, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Cyrus v. Laino et al
as 4:2008cv01085
Plaintiff:
John Cyrus
Defendant:
R. Laino, Weidlich, Rasirio and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GROOVER v. OWENS-ILLINOIS
as 2:2008cv67491
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GROOVER
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
