Cases 1 - 10 of 114
INNOVATIVE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC. v. WNEK et al
as 2:2024cv05659
Plaintiff:
INNOVATIVE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC. doing business as INTEGRATED SPORTS MEDIA
Defendant:
STANLEY WNEK, GUSTAVO A. PALACIOS and ESPINDOLA-HERNANDEZ, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gustavo Velez-Hernandez v. District Attorney Lehigh County, et al
as 24-1642
Plaintiff:
GUSTAVO D. VELEZ-HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY, SUPERINTENDENT WAYMART SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gustavo Diaz, et al v. FCA US LLC
as 24-1197
Plaintiff:
GUSTAVO DIAZ, JOSEPH SANTOS, CHRISTIAN A. GIBSON and others
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Nearly Natural, LLC et al v. Kong et al
as 1:2023cv01296
Plaintiff:
Nearly Natural, LLC, Supers Holdings, LLC and NN Super Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Ntxhuav Kong, Gustavo Milla and MossNBloom, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
VELEZ-HERNANDEZ v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LEHIGH COUNTY
as 5:2023cv03045
Petitioner:
GUSTAVO D. VELEZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LEHIGH COUNTY and DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LEHIGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MIRANDA v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv02233
Petitioner:
GUSTAVO ENRIQUE LLANOS MIRANDA
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MARQUEZ et al v. ABC CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00606
Plaintiff:
GUSTAVO MARQUEZ, ANALIA HERNANDEZ and EL ESPINNILLO LLC
Defendant:
ABC CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC, ABC CAPITAL RE LTD, ABC CAPITAL RE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
