Cases 1 - 10 of 14
WOLFE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al.
as 1:2021cv20302
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA WOLFE
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-40
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER v. MAIN et al
as 2:2012cv03757
Plaintiff:
LORENZO OLIVER
Defendant:
MERRILL MAIN, JENNIFER VELEZ, LYNN KOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESTATE OF LYDIA JOY PERRY et al v. SLOAN et al
as 3:2010cv04646
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF LYDIA JOY PERRY , VIVIAN KALE and JANET FANDEL
Defendant:
DEBRA SLOAN, STATE OF NEW JERSEY; DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES-DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, BRIDGET GRIMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALERNO v. JACK DOES 1-40, et al.
as 2:2007cv05391
Plaintiff:
EDWARD SALERNO
Defendant:
JACK DOES 1-40 and JANE DOES 1-40
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAINES v. JACK DOES 1-40 et al
as 2:2007cv05387
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HAINES
Defendant:
JACK DOES 1-40 and JANE DOES 1-40
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CREVELING v. JACK DOES 1-40 et al
as 2:2007cv05381
Plaintiff:
MARK CREVELING
Defendant:
JACK DOES 1-40 and JANE DOES 1-40
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONN v. JACK DOES 1-40 et al
as 2:2007cv05393
Plaintiff:
TERRY CONN
Defendant:
JACK DOES 1-40 and JANE DOES 1-40
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAGAROZY v. JACK DOES 1-40 et al
as 2:2007cv05380
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BAGAROZY
Defendant:
JACK DOES 1-40 and JANE DOES 1-40
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANCHEZ v. JACK DOES 1-40 et al
as 2:2007cv05382
Plaintiff:
FRANK SANCHEZ
Defendant:
JACK DOES 1-40 and JANE DOES 1-40
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CONKRIGHT v. JACK DOES 1-40 et al
as 2:2007cv05390
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CONKRIGHT
Defendant:
JACK DOES 1-40 and JANE DOES 1-40
Objector:
plc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
