Cases 1 - 10 of 30
BROWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04181
Plaintiff:
JOHN BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SERGEANT TAMIKA ALLEN, POLICE OFFICER JAHBRIA GEDDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. SIMONS
as 2:2022cv03296
Plaintiff:
JOHN BROWN, JR.
Defendant:
ALAN SIMONS
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
HORIZON STEVEDORING, INC. v. ROYAL WHITE CEMENT, INC.
as 2:2022cv00711
Counter Defendant:
HORIZON STEVEDORING, INC.
Defendant:
ROYAL WHITE CEMENT, INC.
3Rd Party Defendant:
John Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Hadidi v. City of Shamokin et al
as 4:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Sawsan Hadidi
Defendant:
City of Shamokin, Northumberland County, John Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. City of Shamokin, PA et al
as 4:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Michael Robinson
Defendant:
City of Shamokin, PA, Northumberland County, John Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NGUYEN v. IHS MARKIT LTD et al
as 2:2021cv00848
Defendant:
GAY HUEY EVANS, IHS MARKIT LTD, RUANN F ERNST and others
Plaintiff:
MYLINH NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
SIMONS v. BROWN et al
as 2:2019cv05074
Petitioner:
ALAN SIMONS
Respondent:
LORRAINE BROWN and JOHN BROWN
Robinson v. Millbrand et al
as 4:2017cv01322
Plaintiff:
Michael Robinson
Defendant:
Millbrand, Barbara Maye, Daniel McGrant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ATKINS et al v. BOROUGH OF PHOENIXVILLE et al
as 2:2016cv04503
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ATKINS , ANDREW DUREN and JOEL DAVENPORT
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF PHOENIXVILLE, PHOENIXVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT, FIRE DEPARTMENT JOHN ROES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
