Cases 1 - 7 of 7
AGUILAR v. HOY HEALTH LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01291
Plaintiff:
JOSE AGUILAR
Defendant:
HOY HEALTH LLC, MARIO ANGLADA, XYZ CORP (1-5) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Orantes v. USP Lewisburg Penitentiary Food Administrator et al
as 3:2018cv01037
Plaintiff:
Jose Aguilar Orantes
Defendant:
USP Lewisburg Penitentiary Food Administrator, Food Service Staff Worker and USP Lewisburg Medical Dpet. Staff Worker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orantes v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv00876
Plaintiff:
Jose Aguilar Orantes
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
FRISCHOLZ et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2011cv00507
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FRISCHOLZ and DENISE FRISCHOLZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS , JOHN J. MOOSSY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
MORALES-RAMIREZ et al v. INTERNATIONAL PERSONNEL RESOURCES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv07031
Plaintiff:
NESTOR MORALES-RAMIREZ , CARLOS SUAREZ-BLANDON , FELICIANO RUIZ-VALENCIA and others
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL PERSONNEL RESOURCES, INC. and THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL GLAH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
MONTGOMERY, MCCRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP v. EVERGREEN I INVESTMENT, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv02157
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY, MCCRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP
Defendant:
EVERGREEN I INVESTMENT LLC, POST-EFFECTIVE DATE CREDITORS COMMITTEE AS AGENT FOR THE PI SETTLING PLAINTIFFS, THE, ERA ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
MONTGOMERY, MCCRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP v. EVERGREEN I INVESTMENT LLC et al
as 3:2010cv02025
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY, MCCRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP
Defendant:
EVERGREEN I INVESTMENT LLC, THE POST-EFFECTIVE DATE CREDITORS COMMITTEE AS AGENT FOR THE PI SETTLING PLAINTIFFS, ERA ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
