Cases 1 - 9 of 9
GARY SCHADER v. THERO et al
as 3:2022cv02017
Plaintiff:
Gary Schader, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant Amarin Corporation PLC and GARY SCHADER
Defendant:
John F. Thero, Michael W. Kalb, Lars G. Ekman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
WHITFIELD v. ACCELERON PHARMA INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04628
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
ACCELERON PHARMA INC., FRANCOIS NADER, HABIB DABLE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Wilson v. Acceleron Pharma Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01473
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wilson
Defendant:
Acceleron Pharma Inc., Habib J. Dable, Terrence C. Kearney and others
In re: Amarin Corp PLC
as 21-2071
Defendant / Appellee:
CRAIG B. GRANOWITZ, AMARIN CORPORATION PLC, JOHN THERO and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEBENDRA SHARMA, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner / Appellant:
CATHERINE LITTLE-HUNT, as Trustee of the Gaetano Cecchini Living Trust and DAN KOTECKI
In re: Amarin Corporation PLC
as 16-2640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES F. REISS
Defendant - Appellee:
AMARIN CORP PLC, JOSEPH S. ZAKRZEWSKI, JOHN THERO and others
Bove et al v. Amarin Corporation, PLC. et al
as 3:2013cv07793
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Bove and Joseph J. Bove
Defendant:
AMARIN CORPORATION PLC, JOSEPH S. ZAKRZEWSKI, John Thero and others
Movant:
Jay Heit
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bentley v. Amarin Corporation Plc et al
as 3:2013cv07794
Plaintiff:
Adam Bentley
Defendant:
AMARIN CORPORATION PLC and JOSEPH S. ZAKRZEWSKI
Movant:
Jay Heit
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
SIEGEL et al v. AMARIN CORPORATION PLC et al
as 3:2013cv07210
Plaintiff:
JODI SIEGEL and JODI SIEGEL, IRA
Defendant:
AMARIN CORPORATION PLC, JOSEPH S. ZAKRZEWSKI and JOHN F. THERO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
SKLAR v. AMARIN CORPORATION PLC et al
as 3:2013cv06663
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SKLAR
Defendant:
AMARIN CORPORATION PLC and JOSEPH S. ZAKRZEWSKI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
