Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CONLEY et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01486
Plaintiff:
DANIEL F. CONLEY, ANGELA SCUNZIANO, PAUL ROHAN and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LOPEZ v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI ALBION et al
as 2:2017cv03952
Petitioner:
JOSE LOPEZ
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, SCI ALBION, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOPEZ v. LINK et al
as 2:2016cv01773
Petitioner:
JOSE LOPEZ
Respondent:
CYNTHIA LINK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Santos v. Hernandez
as 3:2015cv00243
Plaintiff:
Angel Luis Santos
Defendant:
Jose Lopez Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LOPEZ et al v. AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN
as 2:2011cv36226
Plaintiff:
JOSE LOPEZ and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LOPEZ et al v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv36225
Plaintiff:
JOSE LOPEZ and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LACROIX et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv02859
Plaintiff:
LUC LACROIX , JOSE LOPEZ-RIVERA , JAMES HAGAN and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LOPEZ et al v. HESS OIL VIRGIN ISLANDS CORP et al
as 2:2007cv64437
Plaintiff:
JOSE LOPEZ and GLADYS LOPEZ
Defendant:
HESS OIL VIRGIN ISLANDS CORP, AMARADA HESS CORPORATION, PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
