Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Michael Hodge v. US Dept Justice, et al
as 09-3723
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EUGENE HODGE
Defendant - Appellee:
US DEPT JUSTICE, US MARSHAL SER, BUR PRISONS, and its unknown employees and others
Eliot Sash v. Karen Hogsten, et al
as 09-1728
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIOT S. SASH
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN HOGSTEN, Warden of Low Security Correctional Institution Allenwood, JAMES POTOPE, Assistant Health Services Administrator, JAMES BRADY, Clinical Director and others
Jorge Hughes v. Karen Hogsten, et al
as 08-4726
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORGE HUGHES
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN HOGSTEN, C. VERMER, RONALD LAINO and others
Cordero Candido v. Karen Hogsten, et al
as 08-2273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORDERO CANDIDO
Defendant - Appellee:
F. CIOFFI, J. MARR, C. PARKER and others
Frederick Hegney v. Karen Hogsten, et al
as 08-1589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK HEGNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN HOGSTEN, Warden, FCI Allenwood
Defendant:
THOMAS A. MARINO
Griffin v. Hogsten et al
as 3:2007cv02194
Petitioner:
Willie J. Griffin
Respondent:
Karen Hogsten, State of Florida and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ortiz-Orona v. Hogsten et al
as 4:2007cv01858
Petitioner:
Humberto Alonso Ortiz-Orona
Respondent:
Karen Hogsten and Alberto Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Levi v. Lappin et al
as 1:2007cv01839
Plaintiff:
Bernard S. Levi
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Scott Dodrill, Harold Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perotti v. Hogsten
as 3:2007cv01665
Petitioner:
John W. Perotti
Respondent:
Karen Hogsten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Galab v. Lappin et al
as 4:2007cv01594
Plaintiff:
Faysal Galab
Defendant:
Harvey Lappin, Karen Hogsten, Karl Bittenbender and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
