Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Berroteran v. CIT Group Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00038
Defendant:
Dorene C. Dominguez, FC Merger Subsidiary IX, Inc., William M. Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Berroteran
STRICKLAND v. CIT GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00696
Defendant:
MICHAEL A CARPENTER, WILLIAM M FREEMAN, R BRAD OATES and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN STRICKLAND
KONDER v. CIT GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2020cv18449
Defendant:
DORENE C. DOMINGUEZ, WILLIAM M. FREEMAN, KHANH T. TRAN and others
Plaintiff:
ZOLTAN KONDER
Thomas v. CIT Group Inc. et al.
as 1:2020cv01641
Defendant:
Dorene C. Dominguez, FC Merger Subsidiary IX, Inc., William M. Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas
RHODA v. CIT GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2020cv17547
Defendant:
DORENE C. DOMINGUEZ, R. BRAD OATES, WILLIAM M. FREEMAN and others
Plaintiff:
BRENT RHODA
Ordonez v. CIT Group Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01586
Defendant:
Dorene C. Dominguez, FC Merger Subsidiary IX, Inc., William M. Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Blake Ordonez
BUFFALO GROVE POLICE PENSION FUND v. DIEFENDERFER et al
as 2:2019cv00062
Defendant:
JANE J THOMPSON, WILLIAM M DIEFENDERFER, III, SOMSAK CHIVAVIBAL and others
Nominal Defendant:
NAVIENT CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
BUFFALO GROVE POLICE PENSION FUND
Gusinsky v. CA, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01221
Defendant:
Jens Alder, Jeffrey G. Katz, Christopher B. Lofgren and others
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Gusinsky
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lemon Bay Partners, et al v. Bruce Hammonds, et al
as 08-2167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD F. BENOIT, LEMON BAY PARTNERS and MALCOLM ROSENWALD
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES H. BERICK, MARY M. BOIES, BENJAMIN R. CIVILETTI and others
Lemon Bay Partners et al v. Hammonds et al
as 1:2007cv00562
Plaintiff:
Lemon Bay Partners and Malcolm Rosenwald
Defendant:
Bruce L. Hammonds, Kenneth A. Vecchione, Richard K. Struthers and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
