Cases 1 - 9 of 9
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Bitener, et al
as 16-2723
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BITENER, LT., T. JONES, SANCHEZ, DET. and others
Defendant:
KOEPPEN, MARCHANELLO, LT., GRANT and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. E. Hall, et al
as 16-2147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
E. HALL, Lt., MARCHANELLO, Lt., BITENER, Lt. and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al
as 16-2149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, Central Office, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE and others
In re: James Roudabush, Jr.
as 16-1860
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Respondent:
E. HALL, Lt., MARCHANELLO, Ltd., LT. BITENER, Lt. and others
Nominal Respondent:
NOEL L. HILLMAN
ROUDABUSH, JR. v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2016cv00251
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR FOR THE NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Bitener, et al
as 15-3699
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BITENER, LT., T. JONES, SANCHEZ, DET. and others
Defendant:
MARCHANELLO, LT., KOEPPEN, GRANT and others
ROUDABUSH, JR. v. HALL et al
as 1:2015cv07887
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
E. HALL, MARCHANELLO, BITENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Bitener, et al
as 15-3137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. BITENER, MARCHANELLO, LT., T. JONES and others
ROUDABUSH v. BITENER et al
as 1:2015cv03185
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
BITENER, MARCHANELLO, T. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
