Cases 1 - 7 of 7
WALLACE et al v. A P GREEN INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv63554
Plaintiff:
JAMES E WALLACE, JAMES E WALLACE, JAMES E WALLACE and others
Defendant:
A P GREEN INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, MEXICO BRICK & FIRE CLAY COMPANY, A P GREEN FIRE & BRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Wallace v. Federated Dept Stores Inc, et al
as 08-4588
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGARET WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPT STORE DEFENDANTS
John Wallace, et al v. Richard Abell, et al
as 08-3484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WALLACE
Plaintiff:
MARGARET WALLACE, WIFE, HEATHER WALLACE, DAUGHTER, CHILD #1, COSETTE WALLACE, DAUGHTER, CHILD #2 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD ABELL, FEDERAL EMPLOYEE OF US COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS: SPECIAL MASTER and JAN HORBALY, FEDERAL EMPLOYEE OF US COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS: SPECIAL MASTER
Wallace, et al v. Fed Empl US Dist Ct EDPA, et al
as 08-2548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WALLACE and MARGARET WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
FED EMPL US DIST CT EDPA, R BARCLAY SURRICK, CHARLES R WEINER and others
Defendant:
RANDY SEIDEL, FORMER CEO, STEVE GARZA, FORMER DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, UNKNOWN OTHERS, JADO ASSOC, AND THE MANAGEMENT AND OWNERSHIP AT ALL LEVELS and others
WALLACE v. OWENS-ILLINOIS
as 5:2008cv67707
Plaintiff:
MARGARET WALLACE
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WALLACE et al v. ABELL et al
as 2:2007cv04918
Plaintiff:
JOHN WALLACE, MARGARET WALLACE, HEATHER WALLACE and others
Defendant:
RICHARD ABELL and JAN HORBALY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALLACE et al v. FEDERAL EMPLOYEES OF US DISTRICT COURT, EDPA et al
as 2:2007cv01132
Plaintiff:
JOHN WALLACE and MARGARET WALLACE
Defendant:
FEDERAL EMPLOYEES OF US DISTRICT COURT, EDPA, FEDERAL EMPLOYEES OF US DISTRICT COURT, EDPA, CHARLES WIENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
