Cases 1 - 8 of 8
HUNT v. ALLERGAN, INC
as 2:2021cv12217
Plaintiff:
MARIE HUNT
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, INC
In Re:
ALLERGAN BIOCELL TEXTURED BREAST IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUNT v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv14723
Defendant:
IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC"), JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
ANN MARIE HUNT
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edward Kates v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 15-3940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY GOVENOR CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
JOHN DIMAIO
Edward Kates v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 15-2259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
KATES v. CHRISTIE et al
as 2:2014cv05769
Plaintiff:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILSON v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2014cv03746
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, JAMES T. PLOUSIS, SAMUEL J. PLUMERI, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. ROSS et al
as 1:2010cv06479
Plaintiff:
JEMELLE BROWN
Defendant:
YOLETTE C. ROSS, SAMUEL J. PLUMERI, JR., MARY HUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADLEY et al V. A.C.AND S.,INC.(A,ET AL
as 2:2007cv66351
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY M. BRADLEY, ELOSKIA BRADLEY, BOBBIE JEAN BRYANT and others
Defendant:
A C AND S, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
