Cases 1 - 10 of 240
SEIZURE OF ONE EA BAG OF PRECIOUS METALS AND ONE EA BAG OF THORIUM AND SILVER
as 5:2023mc00140
In Re:
SEIZURE OF ONE EA BAG OF PRECIOUS METALS:No. 23-MC-_____________ AND ONE EA BAG OF THORIUM AND SILVER and SEIZURE OF ONE EA BAG OF PRECIOUS METALS AND ONE EA BAG OF THORIUM AND SILVER
Woodford Eurasia Assets Ltd. et al v. Lottery.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01317
Plaintiff:
Woodford Eurasia Assets Ltd., MC Holdings Group, LLC, ALD Holdings Group, LLC and others
Defendant:
Lottery.com, Inc., Matthew McGahan, Barney Battles and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff:
A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner:
MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master:
JOSE L. LINARES
In Re:
LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court:
FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor:
MYLAN INC.
Interested Party:
CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Yous et al v. Valadez et al
as 4:2023cv01577
Plaintiff:
Jay C. Yous and Deborah J. Yous
Defendant:
Mark A. Valadez and MC Transport II, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
MC GARRY v. LINCOLN LIFE & ANNUITY COMPANY OF NEW YORK
as 2:2023cv20504
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Mc GARRY and KATHLEEN F. MC GARRY
Defendant:
LINCOLN LIFE & ANNUITY OF NEW YORK and LINCOLN LIFE & ANNUITY COMPANY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Lucy Dunne, et al v. Elton Corp, et al
as 23-1868
Appellee:
LUCY DUNNE, representative for Helena duPont Wright, MARY MILLS ABEL-SMITH, CHRISTOPHER T. DUPONT and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES MILLS and T. KIMBERLY WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellant:
FIRST REPUBLIC TRUST CO OF DELAWARE LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
ELTON CORP
Defendant:
GREGORY FIELDS and MC DUPONT CLARK EMPLOYEES PENSION TRUST
Not Classified By Court:
MICHAEL DUPONT
PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC. v. WYETH, INC.
as 3:2011cv05479
Defendant:
WYETH LLC, WYETH, INC., WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
HEB GROCERY COMPANY LP, RITE AID CORPORATION, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Not Classified By Court:
FAITH HOCHBERG
In Re:
EFFEXOR XR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master:
JONATHAN J. LERNER
Interested Party:
IBEW -- NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, MC -- UA Local 119 Health & Welfare Plan, CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
Individual Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Petitioner:
TIMMY P. THIEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
CNA INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. WINIA ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD
as 2:2023cv04375
Plaintiff:
CNA INTERNATIONAL, INC. d/b/a MC APPLIANCE CORPORATION
Defendant:
WINIA ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lucy Dunne, et al v. Elton Corp, et al
as 23-1869
Appellant:
LUCY DUNNE, representative for Helena duPont Wright, MARY MILLS ABEL-SMITH, CHRISTOPHER T. DUPONT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MILLS
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WRIGHT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
T. KIMBERLY WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
ELTON CORP and FIRST REPUBLIC TRUST CO OF DELAWARE LLC
Defendant:
GREGORY FIELDS and MC DUPONT CLARK EMPLOYEES PENSION TRUST
Not Classified By Court:
MICHAEL DUPONT
Lucy Dunne, et al v. Elton Corp, et al
as 23-1546
Appellee:
LUCY DUNNE, representative for Helena duPont Wright, JAMES B. WYETH, solely as executor and personal representative of the estate of Phyllis M. Wyeth, MARY MILLS ABEL-SMITH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MILLS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
T. KIMBERLY WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
ELTON CORP, GREGORY FIELDS, FIRST REPUBLIC TRUST CO OF DELAWARE LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
