Cases 1 - 10 of 281
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan v. Steele et al
as 3:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
Defendant:
Michael B. Steele, Sarah Brown and Kevin Lee Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Theresa Laws v. Borough of Lansdale, et al
as 24-1562
Plaintiff:
THERESA MARIA LAWS
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF LANSDALE, LANDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Municipal liability under Monell, CHIEF MICHAEL B. TRAIL, in personal and official capacities and others
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Peng v. Stephenson et al
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Leon Peng
Defendant:
Randall L. Stephenson, John T. Stankey, Pascal Desroches and others
Thiele v. Stephenson et al
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Steve Thiele
Defendant:
Randall L. Stephenson, John T. Stankey, Pascal Desroches and others
Miller v. Stephenson et al
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
George Miller
Defendant:
Randall L. Stephenson, John T. Stankey, Pascal Desroches and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023mc00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Official Committee of Talc ClaimantsIn re: Official Committee of Talc Claimants
as 23-1826
Petitioner:
In re: OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF TALC CLAIMANTS
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. KAPLAN and LTL MANAGEMENT LLC
LAWS v. BOROUGH OF LANSDALE et al
as 2:2023cv01339
Plaintiff:
THERESA MARIA LAWS
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF LANSDALE, LANSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Police Chief MICHAEL B. TRAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
