Cases 1 - 10 of 58
USA v. Maurice Nichols
as 21-1257
Defendant / Appellant:
MAURICE NICHOLS, a/k/a Michael Peterson
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Harvey et al v. Cline et al
as 3:2018cv00939
Plaintiff:
Vincent Harvey and Richard Hawkins
Defendant:
D. Cline, Tammy Ferguson, PA Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv01703
Plaintiff:
CHERYL PETERSON and JAMES MICHAEL PETERSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Maurice Nichol
as 17-3240
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURICE NICHOLS, a/k/a Michael Peterson
In re: Maurice Nichol
as 17-1939
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: MAURICE NICHOLS, a/k/a Michael Peterson
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
In re: Maurice Nichol
as 16-4167
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: MAURICE NICHOLS, a/k/a Michael Peterson
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
PETERSON v. AFLAC INSURANCE CO. et al
as 2:2015cv03410
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PETERSON
Defendant:
AFLAC INSURANCE CO. , JOHN AND JANE DOES 1 THROUGH 10, ABC CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Maurice Nichol
as 13-3670
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURICE NICHOLS, aka Michael Peterson
PETERSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv41416
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PETERSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
ANGELO et al v. MASTRIANI MASONRY
as 2:2009cv00058
Plaintiff:
PAT ANGELO, JOSEPH DEVITA, ROBERT GARIEPY and others
Defendant:
MASTRIANI MASONRY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
