Cases 1 - 9 of 9
JOHNSON v. MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2023cv01743
Plaintiff:
JUANITA JOHNSON
Defendant:
MACY RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC., MACYS RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC. and MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Hozay Royal v. Macys Retail Holdings LLC, et al
as 23-1593
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOZAY A. ROYAL
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY NAKAHARA and MACYS RETAIL HOLDINGS LLC
Hozay Royal v. Macys Retail Holdings LLC, et al
as 23-1207
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOZAY A. ROYAL
Defendant / Appellee:
MACYS CORP, JAY NAKAHARA and MACYS RETAIL HOLDINGS LLC
BROWN v. MACY'S et al
as 2:2022cv04285
Defendant:
MACY'S, MACYS SPRINGFIELD, MACYS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SHAREEM BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
KANTE v. SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv01418
Plaintiff:
MAFOUEDIE KANTE
Defendant:
SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION, MACYS RETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC, SCHINDLER ENTERPRISES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01883
Plaintiff:
Shakirah Smith
Defendant:
Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC, Macy's East, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. MACY'S INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06059
Defendant:
MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC., MACY'S INC. and MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEMBLETON v. MACY'S, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05024
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. l/t/a Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC, MACY'S, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE PEMBLETON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CORKLIN et al v. MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00299
Defendant:
MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC and BLUE CHIP 2000 COMMERCIAL CLEANING, INC.
Plaintiff:
KEN CORKLIN and DENISE CORKLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
