Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Frank Hubbard v. Gary Lanigan, et al
as 23-2359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK HUBBARD
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY LANIGAN, STEVEN JOHNSON and RALPH WOODWARD
Defendant:
MARY LANG
Adrian GuilleIn re: Adrian Guille
as 21-2842
Petitioner:
In re: ADRIAN GUILLE
Defendant:
STEVEN JOHNSON, RAYMOND ROYCE, SEARS and others
Respondent:
DAVID RICHARDS, AMY EMRICH, S. PATTERSON and others
Adrian Guille v. Steven Johnson, et al
as 21-1515
Defendant:
OFFICER BAILEY, OFFICER MCLINCH, SEARS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIAN GUILLE
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID RICHARDS
Adrian Guille v. Steven Johnson, et al
as 19-2430
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER PARKER, MRS. ADAMS, OFFICER K. FINN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIAN GUILLE
HUBBARD v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2018cv02055
Plaintiff:
FRANK HUBBARD
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, STEVEN JOHNSON, MARY LANG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUILLE v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv01472
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN GUILLE
Defendant:
STEVEN JOHNSON, DAVID RICHARDS, RAYMOND ROYCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2018cv00309
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, RAJIV SHAH, PRESIDENT JOHN OR JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATFORD v. NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON et al
as 3:2016cv07878
Plaintiff:
IRONE WATFORD
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, STEVEN JOHNSON, MARY LANG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROADWAY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv02601
Plaintiff:
OMAR BROADWAY
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY M. LANIGAN, COUNTY OF ESSEX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2015cv07970
Plaintiff:
LOUIS PIERCE
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, STEPHEN D'ILIO, STEPHEN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
