Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Boyd et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv13443
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Dawn Boyd, Mark Netherland, Sharri Neuman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
ROBERTS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv15831
Plaintiff:
NANCY ROBERTS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERTS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv07445
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC
Plaintiff:
NANCY ROBERTS
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steven Dickerson, et al v. York International Corp, et al
as 17-3088
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVEN DICKERSON, ROBERT HESTER, NANCY ROBERTS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
YORK INTERNATIONAL CORP and JOHNSON CONTROLS INC
Appellant:
MICHAEL DICHIARA
Dickerson et al v. York International Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv01105
Plaintiff:
Steven Dickerson , Robert Hester and Nancy Roberts
Defendant:
York International Corporation and Johnson Controls Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert v. Zwicker & Associates, P.C.
as 1:2010cv00116
Plaintiff:
Nancy Robert
Defendant:
Zwicker & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ROBERTS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv02361
Plaintiff:
NANCY ROBERTS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ROBERTS v. RIDER UNIVERSITY
as 3:2008cv05576
Plaintiff:
NANCY ROBERTS
Defendant:
RIDER UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
