Cases 1 - 10 of 11
ELLIS et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv02450
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M. ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH DEPT., THE OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MATTHEWS v. PHILADELPHIA CORPORATION FOR AGING
as 2:2022cv04632
Plaintiff:
NEQUAVA MATTHEWS
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA CORPORATION FOR AGING
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
EVANOSKI v. PHILADELPHIA CORPORATION FOR AGING
as 2:2019cv05589
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVANOSKI
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA CORPORATION FOR AGING
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
CANTY v. PHILADELPHIA CORPORATION FOR AGING et al
as 2:2016cv00520
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN CANTY
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA CORPORATION FOR AGING and PHILADELPHIA INSURANCE COMPANIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
PHILADELPHIA CORPORATION FOR AGING v. WATTS MANUFACTURING
as 2:2012cv01163
Plaintiff:
PHILADELPHIA CORPORATION FOR AGING
Defendant:
WATTS MANUFACTURING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
