Cases 1 - 10 of 21
JOHNSON v. CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, AMERICAN CREDIT UNION, CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
PERRONG v. PROSPERITY REAL ESTATE & INVESTMENT SERVICES LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02293
Defendant:
ALEXANDRA GABRIELLE GIRAUD, PROSPERITY REAL ESTATE & INVESTMENT SERVICES LLC, DOES 1 THROUGH 100 and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
ADEFUMI v. PROSPER
as 2:2019cv01165
Plaintiff:
OLANIYAN MTUNDU ADEFUMI
Defendant:
REBECCA PROSPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ADEFUMI v. PROSPER
as 2:2018cv05341
Plaintiff:
MR. OLANIYAN ADEFUMI
Defendant:
REBECCA PROSPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv01581
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ARMONDO BRIGANDI and REBECCA PROSPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARRICK v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv03601
Plaintiff:
KERIUM ALLEN GARRICK, SR.
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, REBECCA PROSPER and TIMOTHY C. ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARRICK v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv03519
Plaintiff:
KERIUM ALLEN GARRICK, SR.
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , REBECCA PROSPER and TIMOTHY C. ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEBLEY v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv03341
Plaintiff:
ALI SHEBLEY
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Togbe v. Attorney General USA
as 1:2012cv02409
Petitioner:
Prosper Korku Togbe, Jr.
Respondent:
Attorney General USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
