Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CARPENTER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv14312
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
PAMELA R CARPENTER
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edward Miller, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 14-3005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD CHARLES MILLER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MARY J. ANDERS, ROBERT M. FALIN and others
Wayne Culkin v. William Carpenter, et al
as 13-4247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE CULKIN
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM R. CARPENTER, PAUL W. TRESSLER, KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY and others
CULKIN v. CARPENTER et al
as 2:2013cv05047
Plaintiff:
WAYNE CULKIN
Defendant:
WILLIAM R. CARPENTER, PAUL W. TRESSLER, KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. CARPENTER et al
as 2:2011cv04687
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM R. CARPENTER, JENNIFER A GILLESPIE and CHANEL R PYATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2011cv01367
Plaintiff:
Tyree Lawson
Defendant:
William R Carpenter and Jennifer A Gillespie
Fifth_party_defendant:
Chanel R Pyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARPENTER v. ARMSTRONG WORLD IND.
as 2:2011cv65890
Plaintiff:
ROLAND R. CARPENTER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD IND.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARPENTER et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. DOING BUSINESS AS CLEAVER-BROOKS DIVISION et al
as 2:2009cv60042
Plaintiff:
RICHARD F. CARPENTER and JEANA R. CARPENTER
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC. DOING BUSINESS AS CLEAVER-BROOKS DIVISION, BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CARPENTER et al v. AQUA-CHEM INC et al
as 2:2007cv61439
Plaintiff:
MACHEN LEE CARPENTER and PAULETTE R CARPENTER
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM INC, AQUA-CHEM INC, BORG-WARNER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
