Cases 1 - 10 of 573
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
HAYS v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv04694
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
RANDALL HAYS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SWANSON v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04422
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
RANDALL SWANSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
v. Cooper et al
as 2:2024cv03250
Defendant:
Reginald E Davis, LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION, PATRICK S. PITTARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Wiersum v. Cooper et al
as 2:2024cv03251
Defendant:
M. LEANNE LACHMAN, Dale Lefebvre, DENNIS R. GLASS and others
Plaintiff:
Robert R Wiersum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Perez v. Hutchinson et al
as 3:2024cv01224
Defendant:
Randall Hutchinson, Jr. and Kiyra Mooney
Plaintiff:
Joseph Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carr v. Borden et al
as 3:2024cv01085
Defendant:
Randall Hinkle, Sean Borden, Lionel Pierre and others
Plaintiff:
Cody Allen Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollin v. Cooper et al
as 2:2024cv02713
Defendant:
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION, Randal J Freitag, PATRICK S. PITTARD and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hollin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
PENDLETON v. TODD et al
as 2:2024cv00884
Defendant:
STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR. and RANDAL B. TODD
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MEADE v. LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv01704
Plaintiff:
DONALD C. MEADE
Defendant:
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION, ELLEN COOPER, DENNIS GLASS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
