Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Reese et al
as 1:2022cv00504
Plaintiff:
American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania
Defendant:
Allen Reese, Aurore Yates, Bruce Mosley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Finger v. Vonage Holdings Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Susan Finger
Defendant:
Vonage Holdings Corp., Hamid Akhavan, Jeffrey A. Citron and others
Barcus et al v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2019cv02212
Plaintiff:
Tajammal Hayat, Artis Francies, Heidi DeSesa and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acosta et al v. Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, et al.
as 1:2015cv01024
Plaintiff:
Ronald Layne Smith, Ryan C. Rasmussen, Reginald J. Belton and others
Defendant:
Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, KBR, Inc., Halliburton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broadcast Music Inc. et al v. Second Step Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv00727
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music Inc. , Adult Music , Screen Gems-DMI Music Inc. and others
Defendant:
Second Step Corp., Joshua Grapski, Kevin Reading and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Braun v. City of Reading et al
as 1:2013cv00444
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee Braun
Defendant:
City of Reading and Golden Bowl Restaurant Owner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Read v. Deloy et al
as 1:2009cv00539
Petitioner:
Mark J. Read
Respondent:
Michael E. Deloy and Attorney General of State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
