Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ANCERO, LLC v. BIOTEK REMEDYS, INC.
as 2:2020cv02369
Defendant:
BIOTEK REMEDYS, INC.
Plaintiff:
ANCERO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PERFECT REMEDY, INC. v. VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY
as 1:2019cv01751
Plaintiff:
PERFECT REMEDY, INC.
Defendant:
VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
PERFECT REMEDY, INC. v. VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY
as 3:2019cv14380
Plaintiff:
PERFECT REMEDY, INC.
Defendant:
VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HEAT AND FROST INSULATORS AND ASBESTOS WORKERS LOCAL NO. 14 et al v. PRIME GROUP REMEDIATION, INC.
as 2:2012cv03706
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HEAT AND FROST INSULATORS AND ASBESTOS WORKERS LOCAL NO. 14 and MICHAEL BURNS
Defendant:
PRIME GROUP REMEDIATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MT. LAUREL HOTEL DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. LUKOIL et al
as 1:2009cv05709
Plaintiff:
MT. LAUREL HOTEL DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Defendant:
LUKOIL, LUKOIL AMERICAS CORPORATION, MOBIL OIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
PRIME GROUP REMEDIATION, INC. v. FLATIRON BUILDING COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv02437
Plaintiff:
PRIME GROUP REMEDIATION, INC.
Defendant:
FLATIRON BUILDING COMPANY, INC. and GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
MARCOR REMEDIATION, INC. v. C/G ELECTRODES LLC
as 1:2007cv00139
Plaintiff:
MARCOR REMEDIATION, INC.
Defendant:
C/G ELECTRODES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
A.G. POWELL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION v. TETRA TECH CONSULTING & REMEDIATION, INC.
as 2:2007cv00184
Plaintiff:
A.G. POWELL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
Defendant:
TETRA TECH CONSULTING & REMEDIATION, INC., TETRA TECH CONSULTING & REMEDIATION, INC. and TETRA TECH CONSULTING & REMEDIATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
