Cases 1 - 9 of 9
COOK v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv06823
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. COOK
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOK et al v. MPI INDUSTRIES, LLC. et al
as 1:2017cv01937
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH T. COOK, JR. and ELEANOR T. FOSTER
Defendant:
MPI INDUSTRIES, LLC. and JOHN DOE INDIVIDUALS AND/OR BUSINESS ENTITIES (PLURAL 1-10)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
COOK v. CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2016cv07272
Plaintiff:
DARRIS T. COOK
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DAVID S. OWENS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America et al v. Cook
as 1:2012mc00059
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Jakob Pedersen
Defendant:
Richard T. Cook
COOK et al v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv06043
Plaintiff:
MARY T. COOK
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and KATHLEEN COOK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
COOK v. PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv63132
Plaintiff:
CHARLES T. COOK and CHARLES T. COOK
Defendant:
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY, PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY, DRILLING SPECIALTIES COMPANY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MARTIN v. ROCHE et al
as 2:2008cv03004
Plaintiff:
ELBERT THOMAS MARTIN
Defendant:
M ROCHE, R. COX, T. FRIEDERICHS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
COOK v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv81520
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ALICE T. COOK
Cause Of Action: Diversity
COOK v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv60951
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. COOK, JOHN T. COOK, JOHN T. COOK and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
