Cases 1 - 10 of 20
CARROLL INDEPENDENT FUEL, LLC v. JAJ ENTERPRISE, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01631
Plaintiff:
CARROLL INDEPENDENT FUEL, LLC
Defendant:
JAJ ENTERPRISE, LLC, TREXLER EXPRESS, LLC, TREXLERTOWN RETAIL CENTER, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
CARROLL INDEPENDENT FUEL, LLC v. JAJ ENTERPRISE, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv01631
Plaintiff:
CARROLL INDEPENDENT FUEL, LLC
Defendant:
RAJI, INC, JAJ ENTERPRISE, LLC, TREXLER EXPRESS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TREXLER v. KIJAKAZI
as 5:2023cv00837
Plaintiff:
JESSICA NICOLE TREXLER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TREXLER et al v. DODGE CITY INC. et al
as 1:2020cv06983
Defendant:
DODGE CITY, INC., JOHN DOE 1-99, FCA US LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH TREXLER and CAROLYN TREXLER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
TREXLER v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv21755
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Plaintiff:
ALAN TREXLER
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BENCKINI v. COOPERSBURG BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2015cv06017
Plaintiff:
GENE C. BENCKINI
Defendant:
COOPERSBURG BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, DANIEL C. TREXLER, WILLIAM NAHRGANG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHMOYER v. HOME PROPERTIES TREXLER, LLC
as 5:2015cv01514
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SCHMOYER
Defendant:
HOME PROPERTIES TREXLER PARK, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ENDACOTT v. TREXLER
as 2:2014cv04739
Plaintiff:
NANCY ENDACOTT
Defendant:
JARED TREXLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
