Cases 1 - 10 of 18,306
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
YOUNG v. U.S. BANK et al
as 2:2024cv02315
Plaintiff:
KASHMIR S. YOUNG
Defendant:
U.S. BANK, SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE COMPANY and NEW RESIDENTIAL INVESTMENT CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
NORSEN v. U.S. MARSHAL'S SERVICE et al
as 3:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
RICHARD DZIONARA NORSEN
Respondent:
U.S. MARSHAL'S SERVICE, U.S.ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND, MONROE COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DUBOSE v. FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE et al
as 2:2024cv02101
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR DUBOSE
Defendant:
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE and U.S. ATTORNEY OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
