Cases 1 - 10 of 487
RUIZ v. MONMOUTH COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2024cv09342
Defendant:
IHRHIEM IANH, MR. DAN, MONMOUTH COUNTY JAIL and others
Plaintiff:
VERNON S. RUIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TEDESCO et al v. BOROUGH OF HADDONFIELD NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2024cv09005
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF HADDONFIELD and NEW JERSEY-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHELE TEDESCO, ALEX COLALILLO, ROSE PALLADINO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MOORE v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2024cv08930
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRALL v. KUHN et al
as 3:2024cv08778
Defendant:
ALLISON MYERS, GARY M LANIGAN, JOSEPH SANTIAGO and others
Plaintiff:
TORMU E PRALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
RUIZ v. DILL et al
as 3:2024cv08554
Defendant:
SGT. RYANN DILL, WARDEN VICTOR IANNELLO and MS. MILLER
Plaintiff:
VERNON S. RUIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ESQUARED TRADING LLC v. SHARP CORPORATION et al
as 3:2024cv08367
Plaintiff:
ESQUARED TRADING LLC
Defendant:
VICTOR TECHNOLOGY LLC and SHARP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
SANCHEZ-GARCIA v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv08204
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Petitioner:
VICTOR SANCHEZ-GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MEJIA MARTE et al v. CHANG
as 1:2024cv07851
Defendant:
APRIL CHANG
Plaintiff:
KARLA BARRALAGA and VICTOR MEJIA MARTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv07827
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
