Cases 1 - 10 of 15
WOODHOUSE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv06810
Plaintiff:
JUANITA WOODHOUSE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES & PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOODHOUSE v. SPEARMAN et al
as 2:2022cv01208
Plaintiff:
SHEILA WOODHOUSE
Defendant:
ALLEN SPEARMAN, All HVAC and Electrical LLC, LUIS ESTRADA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Woodhouse v. Makhkamov et al
as 3:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jeremy W. Woodhouse
Defendant:
Zukhriddi Makhkamov and TOJ Logistics Inc. doing business as Reliable Trans Express
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WOODHOUSE v. TIMMONS CONSTRUCTION LLC
as 2:2021cv01577
Plaintiff:
SHEILA WOODHOUSE
Defendant:
Timmons Construction LLC and Ryan Timmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODHOUSE
as 2:2021cv01576
Defendant:
Timmons Construction LLC
Lead Plaintiff:
SHEILA WOODHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOSQUITO HUNTERS, LLC v. KELWOOD, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv05033
Respondent:
DANIEL WOODHOUSE, JEFF KELLY and KELWOOD, INC.
Petitioner:
MOSQUITO HUNTERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
WOODHOUSE v. GRAY et al
as 2:2020cv05086
Plaintiff:
SHEILA WOODHOUSE
Defendant:
RASHEED GRAY doing business as GRAYSTONE HOME REMODELING and LAWRENCE D STOKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GORDON v. D.O.C. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2017cv02175
Plaintiff:
Brian Gordon
Defendant:
Woodhouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORDON v. D.O.C. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv05198
Plaintiff:
BRIAN GORDON
Defendant:
D.O.C. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, S.C.I. ROCKVIEW, M. HOUSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodhouse v. USA
as 1:2016cv00514
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Darrell Woodhouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
