Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Mills v. Mahally et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv02033
Respondent: Superintendent Lawrence Mahally and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Petitioner: George B. Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRANDL v. MILLS
as 3:2013cv00175
Plaintiff: ROBERT P. BRANDL
Defendant: DALE B. MILLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
POGGIOLI et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv80099
Plaintiff: THERESA C. POGGIOLI, MARTHA C. SPALDING, DORIS STALLARD and others
Defendant: A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AGL WELDING SUPPLY CO., INC., ALFA LAVAL,INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
MILLS et al v. CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv66502
Plaintiff: EDWARD B. MILLS and HELEN MILLS
Defendant: CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY, CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY, OWNES-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
POGGIOLI et al v. A.J. FRIEDMAN SUPPY CO., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00504
Plaintiff: THERESA C. POGGIOLI, MARTHA C. SPALDING and DORIS STALLARD
Defendant: A.J. FRIEDMAN SUPPY CO., INC., A.J. MCNEIL CO.,INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PITTMAN v. INC. ASBESTOS CORP. OF AM et al
as 2:2007cv63179
Plaintiff: NATHANIEL PITTMAN
Defendant: INC. ASBESTOS CORP. OF AM, LTD. ASBESTOS CORP, E & B MILL SUPPLY CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BONZINHO v. ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. et al
as 2:2007cv63323
Plaintiff: ARLENE BONZINHO
Defendant: ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. and BELL ASBESTOS MINES LTD.
ThirdParty Defendant: ASBESTOS CORP. OF AMERICA, E & B MILL SUPPLY COMPANY, GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?