Cases 1 - 10 of 15
BURKE et al v. BACHERT et al
as 5:2023cv01959
Plaintiff:
SEAN P BURKE, EQUINOX ADVANTAGE REAL ESTATE I, INC., STELLA CADENTE INVESTMENTS, LLC and others
Defendant:
POLICE CHIEF EDWARD BACHERT, OFFICER RICHARD PENN, CHARLES F ZURICK, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EQUINOX PROPERTIES, LLC v. THE HARFORD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2021cv15929
Plaintiff:
EQUINOX PROPERTIES, LLC
Defendant:
THE HARFORD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv06053
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SANDERS v. EQUINOX FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC
as 3:2019cv05655
Plaintiff:
VANCE SANDERS
Defendant:
EQUINOX FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv16362
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BROOKFIELD EQUINOX LLC v. UNITED BANK CARD, INC.
as 5:2016cv03622
Plaintiff:
BROOKFIELD EQUINOX LLC
Defendant:
UNITED BANK CARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00309
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KUNNEY et al v. TEMPLETON PROPERTIES II LP et al
as 2:2014cv01704
Plaintiff:
WILMOT KUNNEY, SR. , AGNES TARPEH , WILMOT KUNNEY, JR. and others
Defendant:
TEMPLETON PROPERTIES II LP, TEMPLETON RENTALS, LP, EQUINOX MANAGEMENT & CONSTRUCTION LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MCCARTHY et al v. EQUINOX HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00037
Plaintiff:
LESLEY MCCARTHY and KIM KENNEDY
Defendant:
EQUINOX HOLDINGS, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
