Cases 61 - 70 of 6,181
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Elbert Gaynor v. Calvin Ball
as 24-1430
Plaintiff:
ELBERT GAYNOR
Defendant:
CALVIN BALL, JACOB DAY and WES MOORE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Anthony Gardner, Jr. v. Kenyatta Momon
as 24-1424
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LAMONT GARDNER, JR.
Defendant:
KENYATTA MOMON, in his individual and official capacity as a member of the Fairfax County Police Department, THOMAS ARMEL, in his individual and official capacity as a member of the Fairfax County Police Department and COUNTY OF FAIRFAX
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Randall Williams v. Charleston County Sheriff's Office
as 24-1238
Plaintiff:
RANDALL WILLIAMS, Personal Representative of the Estates of Shanice R. Dantzler-Williams and Miranda R. Dantzler-Williams and BETTY SIMMONS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Stephanie Dantzler
Defendant:
EMILY PELLETIER, CLINTON SACKS, CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Deafueh Monbo v. Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc.
as 24-1292
Plaintiff:
DEAFUEH MONBO and JUAHDI MONBO
Defendant:
UPPER CHESAPEAKE MEDICAL CENTER, INC., HARFORD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., ESKINDER AFEWORK, individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center Inc. and others
Na'Im Anderson v. Baltimore County, Maryland
as 24-1314
Plaintiff:
NA'IM ANDERSON
Defendant:
BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND, STATE OF MARYLAND, OFFICE OF THE STATE'S ATTORNEY FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY and others
Raymond May, Jr. v. Martin Fein Interest Ltd.
as 24-1323
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND EARL MAY, JR. and ANGELA DOLORES MAY
Defendant:
MARTIN FEIN INTEREST LTD.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
