Cases 111 - 120 of 662
David Sutherland v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
as 22-1173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID EARL SUTHERLAND
Defendant / Appellee:
R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY and others
Chris Templeton v. Bishop of Charleston
as 22-1166
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRIS TEMPLETON
Defendant / Appellee:
THE BISHOP OF CHARLESTON, a Corporation Sole
Defendant:
ROBERT GUGLIEMONE, The Bishop Of Charleston, in his official capacity, Successor in interest to and on behalf of Ernest Unterkeoffler,former Bishop of Charleston, sued individually in his official capacity
Michael Hairston v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 22-1132
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL HAIRSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.
Raymond Faber v. Mountain States Physician Group, Inc.
as 22-1072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND FABER
Defendant / Appellee:
MOUNTAIN STATES PHYSICIAN GROUP, INC., a Tennessee corporation and BALLAD HEALTH, a Tennessee corporation
William Hayes v. John Whitley
as 22-1062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM T. HAYES
Plaintiff:
ROY L. PERRY-BEY, PHILLIP WEBSTER, GEORGE BOWE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WHITLEY, THOMAS B. MODLY, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Navy, DENIS R. MCDONOUGH and others
Catherine Alexander v. FedEx Ground Package System
as 22-1044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CATHERINE ALEXANDER
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM
Sushila Gaur v. James Millikan
as 22-1009
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSHILA GAUR
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY JAMES MILLIKAN, Office of Public Defender, OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER and OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mabel Osei v. Cushman & Wakefield
as 21-2427
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MABEL OSEI
Defendant / Appellee:
CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, f/k/a QSI Facilities, a/k/a Emcon Associates, Inc., ("Cushman & Wakefield")
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
