Other Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 57
David Bardes v. The State of South Carolina We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2133
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID A. BARDES, individually, as a taxpayer
Defendant - Appellee: THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN DOES and others
Thomas Davis v. Christine Wilson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-6668
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS LOUIS DAVIS, Rev
Defendant - Appellee: CHRISTINE WILSON, JAMES BUKOFFSKY, BRIAN CHAPMAN and others
Sandlands C&D LLC v. Horry, County of We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1134
Plaintiff - Appellant: SANDLANDS C&D LLC and EXPRESS DISPOSAL SERVICE LLC
Defendant - Appellee: HORRY, COUNTY OF, a Political Subdivision of the State of South Carolina acting by and through its duly elected County Council and HORRY COUNTY SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY INC.
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. South Carolina, State of
as 13-1034
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD MPH for herself and qui tam and Ex Rel the Government of the Arab Republic of Egypt (Egypt) and as founder and first member of Doctors Against Drunk Drivers (DADD); Orthodox Christians Against Executions (OCAE); Sojourners
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, all solely officially and solely for injunctive and qui tam relief, NIMRATA HALEY, as SC's Governor; all solely officially and solely for injunctive and qui tam relief, ALAN WILSON, as SC's Attorney General; all solely officially and solely for injunctive and qui tam relief and others
Lowcountry Immigration v. Nikki Haley
as 12-2533
Plaintiff - Appellee: LOWCOUNTRY IMMIGRATION COALITION, MUJERES DE TRIUNFO, NUEVOS CAMINOS and others
Defendant - Appellant: NIKKI HALEY, in her official capacity as the Governor of South Carolina and ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of South Carolina
Defendant: JAMES ALTON CANNON, in his official capacity as the Sheriff of Charleston County and SCARLETT A. WILSON, in her official capacity as Solicitor of the Ninth Judicial Circuit
US v. State of South Carolina
as 12-2514
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LOWCOUNTRY IMMIGRATION COALITION, MUJERES DE TRIUNFO and others
Defendant - Appellant: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, NIKKI HALEY, in her official capacity as the Governor of South Carolina, NIKKI HALEY, in her official capacity as the Governor of South Carolina and others
Defendant: JAMES ALTON CANNON, in his official capacity as the Sheriff of Charleston County and SCARLETT A. WILSON, in her official capacity as Solicitor of the Ninth Judicial Circuit
Alonzo Key v. Phillip Miano We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2480
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALONZO KEY
Defendant - Appellee: PHILLIP S. MIANO, Badge 450, MATHEW BARNWELL, Badge 545, CORPORAL SPANN, Badge 520 and others
Defendant: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and AIKEN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Jeffrey Pennington v. Kershaw County We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2442
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEFFREY PENNINGTON
Defendant - Appellee: KERSHAW COUNTY, South Carolina, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, KESHAW COUNTY SOUTH CAROLINA DETENTION CENTER and others
Bridgette Neal v. Duke Energy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2237
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRIDGETTE NEAL, a/k/a Bridgette T. Neal
Defendant - Appellee: DUKE ENERGY, PIKE ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED, SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC WORKS and others
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. State of South Carolina
as 12-2115
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD MPH for herself and qui tam and Ex Rel the government of the Arab Republic of Egypt and qui tam the United States of America
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, NIMRATA HALEY, as SC's Governor, ALAN WILSON, as SC's Attorney General and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?