Cases 41 - 50 of 99
Theodore Justice v. The State of North Carolina
as 15-2195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE JUSTICE
Defendant - Appellee:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, FRANKLIN COUNTY, TOWN OF LOUISBURG and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Town of Cary North Carolina
as 15-2040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF CARY NORTH CAROLINA, HAROLD WEINBRECHT, Mayor, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Danielle Doyle
as 15-2029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, next best friend of J.F.D., a minor child
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIELLE DOYLE, Child Protective Services, Social Worker of Wake County Human Services, of Cary North Carolina in her individual and official capacities, RAMON RAJANO, Director, Wake County Human Services of Raleigh, North Carolina in his individual and official capacities, DAVID COOKE, Manager, Wake County Government of Raleigh, North Carolina in his individual and official capacities and others
William Davis, II v. State of North Carolina
as 15-2032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, and a "Minor J.F.D" as next best friend
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, "Pat McCory" individually and as Governor, WAKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, "Ramon Rojano" individually and as Director and WAKE COUNTY N.C., FAMILY COURT, "Donald Steven" Chief Superior Court Judge 10th Judicial District of Wake County North Carolina individually and in his official capacities
William Davis, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 15-2031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Governor Bev Perdue, Office of the Governor, WAKE COUNTY GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM, WAKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Eric Chasse
as 15-2016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, next best friend of J.F.D., a Minor Child
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC CRAIG CHASSE, individually, and in His official capacities as North Carolina State Judge representing the State of North Carolina
William Davis, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 15-2026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Governor Beverely Perdue, individually and in her official capacity as governor, and predecessor Mike Easley, individually and official capacity as governor, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, WAKE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, David Cook individually, and in his official capacity as county manager of Wake County, North Carolina and others
Tyrone Hurt v. The State of North Carolina
as 15-1997
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HURT
Plaintiff:
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND AMERICAN CITIZENS WITHIN THIS NATION
Defendant - Appellee:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and CHIEF OF POLICE, and all law enforcement
William Davis v. Charlotte Mitchel
as 15-1972
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, as next best friend to his daughter J.F.D., a minor
Plaintiff:
J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLOTTE MITCHEL, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of J.F.D., appointed by the Court, WENDY KIRWAN, individually and as Supervisor Wake County N.C. Guardian Ad Litem Program, NAOMIE LIVINGSTON, Individually and as Director Wake County NC Guardian Ad Litem Program and all staff individually and in their official capacities as program managers, superiors and Advocate Attorneys for the Wake County NC 10th Judicial District Guardi and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Beverly Perdue
as 15-1842
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, as next friend to J.F.D., minor
Plaintiff:
J. F. D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
BEVERLY PERDUE, individually and in her official capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina, WILLIAM C. HARRISON, individually and in his official capacity as Chairperson of the North Carolina State Board of Education, ROSA U. GILL, individually and in her official capacity as Chairperson of the North Carolina State Board of Education and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
