Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Dineen Etienne v. Machelle Sanders
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
MACHELLE SANDERS, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Administration; North Carolina Department of Commerce, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL, Division Executive Director, Historically Underutilized Businesses, BENNY SLOAN, DBW Certification Officer, North Carolina Department of Transportation and others
Evy Orellana v. Deputy United States Marshal Ryan Godec
as 23-2224
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EVY B. ORELLANA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEPUTY UNITED STATES MARSHAL RYAN GODEC, in his individual capacity and DEPUTY UNITED STATES MARSHAL TRISTAN MARTIN, in his individual capacity
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN DOE U.S. MARSHALS 1-2, in their individual capacities
Jermall Brown v. BOCSE McGuire, Esq.
as 23-2110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMALL BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
BOCSE MCGUIRE, ESQ., MARTIN ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY, RONIKA SUMLIN, Magistrate and others
Ka'lah Martin v. Travis Short
as 23-1588
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KA'LAH MARTIN, a/k/a Kalah Martin
Defendant / Appellant:
TRAVIS SHORT, both individually and in his official capacity as deputy with the Randolph County Sheriff's Department, KYLE GABBY, both individually and in his official capacity as deputy with the Randolph County Sheriff's Department and JEREMIAH HARRELSON, both individually and in his official capacity as deputy with the Randolph County Sheriff's Department
Defendant:
GREGORY SEABOLT, in his official capacity as Sheriff of the Randolph County Sheriff's Department, STEVEN W. MYERS, both individually and in his official capacity as internal Affairs Deputy with the Randolph County Sheriff's Department, EDWARD SLAFKY, both individually and in his official capacity as deputy with the Randolph County Sheriff's Department and others
Elizabeth Sines v. Jason Kessler
as 23-1154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELIZABETH SINES, SETH WISPELWEY, MARISSA BLAIR and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER MAGILL and HANNAH PEARCE
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON KESSLER, RICHARD SPENCER, CHRISTOPHER CANTWELL and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL ENOCH PEINOVICH
Amicus Curiae:
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION, LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER, SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER and others
Elizabeth Sines v. Jeff Schoep
as 23-1123
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELIZABETH SINES, SETH WISPELWEY, MARISSA BLAIR and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER MAGILL and HANNAH PEARCE
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFF SCHOEP
Defendant:
JASON KESSLER, RICHARD SPENCER, CHRISTOPHER CANTWELL and others
Elizabeth Sines v. Christopher Cantwell
as 23-1125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELIZABETH SINES, SETH WISPELWEY, MARISSA BLAIR and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER MAGILL and HANNAH PEARCE
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CANTWELL
Defendant:
JASON KESSLER, RICHARD SPENCER, JAMES ALEX FIELDS, JR. and others
Elizabeth Sines v. Nathan Damigo
as 23-1122
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELIZABETH SINES, SETH WISPELWEY, MARISSA BLAIR and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER MAGILL and HANNAH PEARCE
Defendant / Appellant:
NATHAN DAMIGO
Defendant:
JASON KESSLER, RICHARD SPENCER, CHRISTOPHER CANTWELL and others
Amicus Curiae:
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION, LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER, SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER and others
Elizabeth Sines v. Michael Hill
as 23-1119
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELIZABETH SINES, SETH WISPELWEY, MARISSA BLAIR and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER MAGILL and HANNAH PEARCE
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL HILL, MICHAEL TUBBS and LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH
Defendant:
RICHARD SPENCER, JASON KESSLER, CHRISTOPHER CANTWELL and others
Amicus Curiae:
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION, LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER, SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER and others
Elizabeth Sines v. Richard Spencer
as 23-1112
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELIZABETH SINES, SETH WISPELWEY, MARISSA BLAIR and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER MAGILL and HANNAH PEARCE
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD SPENCER
Defendant:
JASON KESSLER, CHRISTOPHER CANTWELL, NATHAN DAMIGO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
