Other Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Taras Raggio v. Chris Davis
as 24-1214
Plaintiff: TARAS N. RAGGIO, PHD
Defendant: SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, Pamlico County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, Craven County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT, Cumberland County Sheriffs Office and others
Criselda Reyes v. Dorchester County of South Carolina
as 23-2100
Plaintiff / Appellant: CRISELDA REYES and EMMANUEL REYES
Defendant / Appellee: DORCHESTER COUNTY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, MIKE GOLDSTON, Dorchester County Public Works Engineering Manager, JASON L. WARD, Dorchester County Administrator and others
Defendant: JASON CARRAHER, Dorchester County Public Works Director
J. Phillips v. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
as 23-1951
Plaintiff / Appellant: J. DWAYNE PHILLIPS, MARK EHRLICH, RYAN MESZAROS and others
Defendant / Appellee: RECTORS AND VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA, WHITTINGTON WHITESIDE CLEMENT, in his official capacity as Rector of the University of Virginia, ROBERT D. HARDIE, in his official capacity as Vice Rector of the University of Virginia and others
Defendant: MARY FRANCES SOUTHERLAND, Chief Administrative Officer UVA Health, in her individual capacity, JOHN DOES 1-5, Senior Human Resources personnel of UVA Health, in their individual capacities, JOHN DOES 1-14, Senior Human Resources personnel of UVA Health, in their individual and official capacities and others
John Dickson, Jr. v. U. S. Dept of Justice We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1365
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: LORETTA E. LYNCH, In her Individual capacity, acting under Color of federal and State Law, Acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise Under The (RICO) Act of Title 18 U.S. Code 1962, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his Individual capacity, acting under color of federal and state law, acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise, under The (RICO) Act of Title 18 U.S. Code 1962, DANA JAMES BOENTE, in his Individual capacity, acting under color of federal and state law, acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise, under The (RICO) Act of Title 18 U.S. Code 1962 and others
Chase Hunter v. Paul Higg We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2046
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHASE CARMEN HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee: PAUL W. HIGGS, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of the City of Fredericksburg, Virginia, WILLIAM REYES, III, individually and in his official capacity as a Deputy for the City of Fredericksburg Sheriff and in his official capacity as a paid worker for the City of Fredericksburg, CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG, VA and others
Chase Hunter v. Thomas Smith
as 12-2012
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHASE CARMEN HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee: THOMAS B. SMITH, individually and in his official capacity as a Florida State Judge, RODRIQUEZ, Judge, individually and in his official capacity as a Florida State Judge, GORDON F. WILLIS, individually and in his official capacity as a Virginia State Judge and others
Chase Hunter v. Paul Higg We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1971
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHASE CARMEN HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee: PAUL W. HIGGS, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of the City of Fredericksburg, Virginia, WILLIAM REYES, III, individually and in his official capacity as a Deputy for the City of Fredericksburg Sheriff and in his official capacity as a paid worker for the City of Fredericksburg, CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG, VA and others
Chase Hunter v. Thomas Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1863
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHASE CARMEN HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee: THOMAS B. SMITH, individually and in his official capacity as a Florida State Judge, RODRIQUEZ, Judge, individually and in his official capacity as a Florida State Judge, GORDON F. WILLIS, individually and in his official capacity as a Virginia State Judge and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?