Cases 31 - 40 of 1,997
Michael Greene v. David Ballard
as 24-6407
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JERMAINE GREENE
Defendant:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden, JONATHAN FRAME, AWS, ANDY MITCHELL and others
James Barnett, Jr. v. Mr. Mouring
as 24-6395
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY BARNETT, JR., a/k/a Lady Ja Barnett
Defendant:
MR. MOURING
Sofia Cano v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6200
Plaintiff:
SOFIA CANO
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRYAN P. STIRLING, DR. CHRIS KUNKLE and others
Sharif Moore v. Peter Danza
as 24-6391
Plaintiff:
SHARIF HAKIM MOORE
Defendant:
PETER T. DANZA, JASON JARMAN, ANTHONY J. TAYLOR and others
Rosivelte Lopes v. Victoria Bynum
as 24-6393
Plaintiff:
ROSIVELTE LOPES
Defendant:
LT. VICTORIA BYNUM
Cecil Quinn, Jr. v. State of South Carolina Marshals
as 24-6249
Plaintiff:
CECIL JEROME QUINN, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA MARSHALS, 7th Judicial, Spartanburg, AGENT DILLION, 7th Judicial Parole Officer, WARDEN ROBERT MICHAEL, Stevenston, III and others
B.J.P. v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6388
Plaintiff:
B.J.P.
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, (SCDC), By and Through Its Director, Bryan P. Stirling, SCDC DIRECTOR BRYAN P. STIRLING, in his Individual and Official Capacities, SCDC DEP. DIR. DENNIS PATTERSON, in his Individual and Official Capacities and others
Edward Wright v. Donnie Raynor
as 24-6286
Plaintiff:
EDWARD A. WRIGHT
Defendant:
DONNIE R. RAYNOR, CHRISTINE E. MANGUM and MONICA BOND
Anthony Hoover v. Stephen Waddell
as 24-6376
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDELL, Warden IV sued in individual and official capacity, ROY A. COOPER, III, Governor sued in individual and official capacity, ELIZABETH N. STRICKLAND, State Asst. District Attorney sued in individual and official capacity and others
Jimmy Causey v. Charles Williams
as 24-6198
Plaintiff:
JIMMY H. CAUSEY
Defendant:
CHARLES WILLIAMS, MS. DAVIS, MS. CLOUD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
