Cases 11 - 20 of 24
David Bardes v. L. Auld
as 15-2396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. BARDES, individually, as a taxpayer
Defendant - Appellee:
L. PATRICK AULD, Magistrate Judge, CATHERINE C. EAGLES, District Judge, PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, Senior U.S. District Judge and others
Marlow Humbert v. Mayor and City Council of Balt
as 15-1768
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLOW HUMBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY, SHEILA DIXON, former Mayor of the City of Baltimore, in her individual capacity, BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant:
CHRIS JONES, Detective Sergeant Individually and as Police Officer, Baltimore City Police Department, MARTIN O'MALLEY, Individually and as Governor of the State of Maryland and former Mayor of the City of Baltimore, KEITH MERRYMAN, Detective Individually and as Police Officer, Baltimore City Police Department and others
Raina Connor v. Tavares Thompson
as 15-1353
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RAINA CONNOR, Administratrix of the Estate of Adam Wade Carter
Defendant - Appellant:
TAVARES THOMPSON, in his official and individual capacities, WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF DONNIE HARRISON, in his official and individual capacities and THE OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
XYZ CORPORATION, in its capacity as Surety on the official bond of the Sheriff of Wake County, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, individually and in their official capacities as Deputy Sheriffs of Wake County, WAKE COUNTY and others
Rory Wallace v. The State of Maryland
as 14-1551
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RORY L. WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
THE STATE OF MARYLAND, PETER FRANCHOT, Comptroller, The State of Maryland Office of Comptroller, STEVE BARZAL, Director, Office of Personnel Services Office Comptroller and others
Torrie Johnson v. Baltimore City Police Dept
as 13-1652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORRIE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, FREDERICK BEALEFELD, Police Commissioner Individually and as Police Commissioner of the Baltimore City Police Department, ADAM LONG, Police Officer, Sequence #F648 Individually and as a Police Officer of the Baltimore City Police Department and others
Randy Thomas v. Ronald Chapman
as 13-1565
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY L. THOMAS, and as Father, Next of Friend, Natural Guardian, and on behalf of A.T.T.
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD L. CHAPMAN, In his Official and Personal Capacity, CHRISTY T. MANN, Judge, In her Official and Personal Capacity, GEORGE E. BATTLE, III, In his Official and Personal Capacity and others
Rosemary Munyiri v. Mitchell E. Frank
as 13-1471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSEMARY MUNYIRI, KIMBERLY FELDER, CHRISTINA SCHAEFFER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCHELL FRANKS, NAOMI B. WILLIAMS and LATRICE LEE
Defendant:
PETER M. HADUCH, JR., in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Baltimore City Police Officer, FREDERICK H. BEALEFELD, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Baltimore City Police Commissioner, BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Shawn Massey v. J. Ojaniit
as 13-1460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN MASSEY
Defendant - Appellee:
J. J. OJANIIT, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Officer, GERALD ESPOSITO, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Officer, TOM G. LEDFORD, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Officer and others
Marcus Mial v. Jennifer Sherin
as 12-1901
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARCUS MIAL
Defendant - Appellant:
JENNIFER SHERIN, BRIAN SAYRE, NATHAN FERGUSON and others
Defendant:
STEPHEN O. SIMPSON, In his official capacity as Sheriff and DEPUTIES JOHN AND JANE DOES ##1-10, In their individual capacities
Randy Thomas v. Ronald Chapman
as 12-1269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY L. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD L. CHAPMAN, In his Official and Personal Capacity, CHRISTY T. MANN, Judge, In her Official and Personal Capacity, GEORGE E. BATTLE, III, In his Official and Personal Capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
